Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:45
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Id ea voluptatem rerum temporibus expedita facere.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Speech by Governor Kugler on the economic outlook and monetary policy - Federal Reserve Board (.gov)
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging - Times of India
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Qui eaque occaecati facere et.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
DC Mayor Bowser’s message for Shakira after WorldPride cancellation: ‘Get yourself here’ - WTOP
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
How to watch Arkansas vs. Creighton Game 2 channel stream, game time - 247Sports
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.